H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anne Keothavong vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-2

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Keothavong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2009 Morocco Open second round 4-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Keothavong
GBR Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #97 4-6 7-5 6-3 Anne Keothavong #54 Match data Apr 30, 2009* R16 Morocco Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #43 6-3 6-4 Anne Keothavong #137 Match data Sep 28, 2006* R32 Guangzhou Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Keothavong #287 #48 1,315 1,633 48 90 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Keothavong Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2001 0–1 0.0% #271 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #177 1,464 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2004 2–4 33.3% #180 1,485 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2005 1–3 25.0% #236 1,466 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2006 0–7 0.0% #144 1,400 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2007 3–5 37.5% #132 1,425 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2008 4–8 33.3% #60 1,464 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2009 13–15 46.4% #100 1,540 0 0 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2010 11–13 45.8% #121 1,613 0 0 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2011 8–9 47.1% #72 1,617 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2012 6–18 25.0% #143 1,526 0 0 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2013 0–4 0.0% #287 1,481 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Keothavong Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2001 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2009 7 7 14 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2011 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 4 11 15 26.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 47 80 41.2% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 31 39 20.5% — — — — — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Keothavong Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1476 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1465 96.7 -0.21 -0.44 0.567 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2004 1486 100.8 -1.08 -0.67 0.618 39.6% — — -13 43.8% -0.81 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2005 1467 93.4 -2.33 -1.56 0.496 34.1% — — — 25.0% -1.88 — — — +0.24 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2006 1401 89.0 -3.21 -4.76 0.551 37.7% +51 — -4 6.7% -3.53 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2007 1425 100.9 -2.40 +0.38 0.930 48.4% +60 — -67 44.4% -0.44 0–2 0–2 — +0.41 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2008 1465 118.5 -1.50 +0.68 0.954 48.9% +49 — -108 35.7% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 +0.21 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2009 1540 114.7 -0.29 -0.29 0.999 50.0% +25 +44 -156 46.8% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.8 +1.51 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2010 1613 116.3 -2.69 +0.49 0.935 48.4% +3 -16 -248 44.6% -0.57 5–5 (50%) 1–1 — -0.61 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2011 1618 117.6 +0.58 +1.18 1.022 50.6% +10 — — 51.2% +0.15 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +0.35 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2012 1527 113.8 -3.60 -2.34 0.783 44.5% +33 -4 -99 35.2% -1.00 1–7 (13%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.95 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2013 1481 97.1 -3.69 -0.76 0.696 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.38 — — — -0.11 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1633 113.5 -1.76 -0.33 0.896 47.5% +25 +21 -101 39.3% -0.82 14–31 (31%) 13–12 (52%) 92.4 +0.54 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.