H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anne Keothavong vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-2

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Keothavong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2009 Fes fourth round 4-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Keothavong
GBR Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 1, 2009* Fes WTA 250 R16 Clay Lourdes Domínguez Lino #97 4-6 7-5 6-3 Anne Keothavong #54 Match data
Sep 28, 2006* Guangzhou WTA 500 R32 Hard Lourdes Domínguez Lino #43 6-3 6-4 Anne Keothavong #137 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anne Keothavong #287 #48 1,315 1,633 48 89 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Keothavong Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2001 0–1 0.0% #271 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #177 1,464 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2004 2–4 33.3% #180 1,485 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2005 1–3 25.0% #236 1,467 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2006 0–7 0.0% #144 1,400 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2007 3–5 37.5% #132 1,425 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2008 4–8 33.3% #60 1,463 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2009 13–15 46.4% #100 1,539 0 0 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2010 11–13 45.8% #121 1,613 0 0 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2011 8–9 47.1% #72 1,618 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2012 6–17 26.1% #143 1,532 0 0 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2013 0–4 0.0% #287 1,485 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2