H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anne Keothavong vs María Sánchez Lorenzo H2H: 0-1
María Sánchez Lorenzo holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Keothavong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 2004 Birmingham third round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2004* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Anne Keothavong | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Keothavong | #287 | #48 | 1,315 | 1,633 | 48 | 89 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | María Sánchez Lorenzo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #60 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #143 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |