H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anne Keothavong vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-2

Anne Keothavong and Tamira Paszek are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Keothavong won the 2012 Birmingham round of 64 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Keothavong
GBR Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Keothavong #76 6-2 7-5 Tamira Paszek Match data Jun 13, 2012* R64 Birmingham International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Anne Keothavong #89 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Tamira Paszek Match data Feb 15, 2012* R64 Qatar Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Tamira Paszek 6-4 6-2 Anne Keothavong #124 Match data Mar 25, 2010* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Tamira Paszek 2-6 6-2 6-4 Anne Keothavong #169 Match data Jun 13, 2007* R64 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Keothavong #287 #48 1,315 1,633 48 90 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Keothavong Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 2001 0–1 0.0% #271 1,486 0 0 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,475 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #177 1,464 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2004 2–4 33.3% #180 1,485 0 0 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2005 1–3 25.0% #236 1,466 0 0 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2006 0–7 0.0% #144 1,400 0 0 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2007 3–5 37.5% #132 1,425 0 0 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2008 4–8 33.3% #60 1,464 0 0 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2009 13–15 46.4% #100 1,540 0 0 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2010 11–13 45.8% #121 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2011 8–9 47.1% #72 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2012 6–18 25.0% #143 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2013 0–4 0.0% #287 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Keothavong Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 2001 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2007 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2008 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2009 7 7 14 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2010 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 4 11 15 26.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 47 80 41.2% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 31 39 20.5% — — — — — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 111/136 of Anne Keothavong's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anne Keothavong Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2003 1/2 1.0 5.0 55.0% 54.5% 27.8% 50.0% 0.0% 42.5% 32.6% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2004 1/6 1.0 3.0 57.1% 50.0% 38.1% 44.4% 25.0% 44.9% 34.0% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2005 1/4 0.0 2.0 59.1% 46.2% 22.2% 14.3% 100.0% 36.4% 31.6% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2006 3/7 1.3 2.0 56.9% 47.1% 38.4% 35.5% 54.5% 43.8% 31.0% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2007 8/8 1.9 4.0 52.9% 60.9% 38.8% 41.8% 52.7% 51.0% 45.5% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2008 12/12 2.4 3.5 57.9% 61.2% 40.5% 43.7% 40.4% 52.6% 45.2% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2009 24/28 2.6 3.0 58.7% 62.7% 45.1% 56.9% 43.0% 55.3% 44.6% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2010 21/24 1.7 3.1 57.4% 58.4% 44.8% 44.3% 48.3% 52.3% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 15/17 1.4 3.7 58.8% 61.8% 48.1% 55.3% 52.1% 56.4% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 21/24 2.6 4.3 53.8% 57.4% 40.5% 43.9% 41.0% 49.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 4/4 2.0 3.8 56.5% 47.2% 45.0% 45.8% 35.8% 46.4% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111/138 2.1 3.5 56.8% 59.2% 43.0% 47.8% 45.3% 52.2% 42.8% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Keothavong Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.13 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 2002 1476 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.04 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2003 1465 96.7 -0.21 -0.44 0.567 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2004 1486 100.8 -1.08 -0.67 0.618 39.6% — — -13 43.8% -0.81 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2005 1467 93.4 -2.33 -1.56 0.496 34.1% — — — 25.0% -1.88 — — — +0.24 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2006 1401 89.0 -3.21 -4.76 0.551 37.7% +51 — -4 6.7% -3.53 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2007 1425 100.9 -2.40 +0.38 0.930 48.4% +60 — -67 44.4% -0.44 0–2 0–2 — +0.41 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2008 1465 118.5 -1.50 +0.68 0.954 48.9% +49 — -108 35.7% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 +0.21 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2009 1540 114.7 -0.29 -0.29 0.999 50.0% +25 +44 -156 46.8% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.8 +1.51 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2010 1613 116.3 -2.69 +0.49 0.935 48.4% +3 -16 -248 44.6% -0.57 5–5 (50%) 1–1 — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1618 117.6 +0.58 +1.18 1.022 50.6% +10 — — 51.2% +0.15 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1527 113.8 -3.60 -2.34 0.783 44.5% +33 -4 -99 35.2% -1.00 1–7 (13%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1481 97.1 -3.69 -0.76 0.696 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.38 — — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1633 113.5 -1.76 -0.33 0.896 47.5% +25 +21 -101 39.3% -0.82 14–31 (31%) 13–12 (52%) 92.4 +0.54 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.