H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anne Keothavong vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-2
Anne Keothavong and Tamira Paszek are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Keothavong won the 2012 Birmingham second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2012* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Anne Keothavong | 6-2 7-5 | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2012* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anne Keothavong | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2010* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tamira Paszek | 6-4 6-2 | Anne Keothavong | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2007* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Tamira Paszek | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Anne Keothavong | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Keothavong | #287 | #48 | 1,315 | 1,633 | 48 | 89 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #60 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #143 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |