H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 1-1

Anne Kremer and Amanda Coetzer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on clay, while Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2000 Eastbourne quarterfinal 3-6 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 24, 2000* Eastbourne WTA 500 QF Grass Anne Kremer #41 3-6 6-0 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #12 Match data
May 9, 2000* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Amanda Coetzer #16 6-3 7-6(3) Anne Kremer #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —