H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Anke Huber H2H: 1-3

Anke Huber holds a 3–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Anke Huber leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2001 Leipzig round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Kremer #37 6-4 6-4 Anke Huber #22 Match data Sep 28, 2001* R16 Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Anke Huber #15 6-4 6-3 Anne Kremer #31 Match data Mar 24, 2001* R32 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anke Huber #16 6-2 6-7(5) 7-5 Anne Kremer #35 Match data Feb 11, 2001* QF Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Anke Huber #27 6-1 7-6 Anne Kremer #31 Match data Sep 2, 1999* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6
20 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10
24 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Kremer Anke Huber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0%
21 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6%
22 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3%
24 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0%
25 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Kremer Anke Huber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91
19 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55
20 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78
21 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81
22 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85
23 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86
24 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51
25 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44
26 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22
27 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12 — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.