H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anne Kremer vs Anke Huber H2H: 1-3
Anke Huber holds a 3–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Anke Huber leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2001 Leipzig fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2001* | Leipzig | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Anne Kremer | 6-4 6-4 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2001* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-4 6-3 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2001* | Paris | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Anke Huber | 6-2 6-7(5) 7-5 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-1 7-6 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Kremer | Anke Huber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |