H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 1-0

Anne Kremer holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 1999 Key Biscayne round of 64 1-6 6-4 6-1.

LUX Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Kremer #52 1-6 6-4 6-1 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #5 Match data Mar 20, 1999* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Kremer — #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario — #1 3,768 2,384 720 271 72.7% 4 6 0 12 7 29

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1986 15–10 60.0% #81 1,620 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 12–13 48.0% #54 1,639 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 31–16 66.0% #18 1,785 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1989 47–13 78.3% #5 2,065 1 3
18 — — — — — — — 1990 38–14 73.1% #7 2,080 1 5
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1991 56–15 78.9% #5 2,167 1 6
20 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0 1992 63–16 79.7% #4 2,283 1 8
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0 1993 72–14 83.7% #2 2,248 1 12
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0 1994 69–9 88.5% #2 2,333 3 20
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0 1995 47–13 78.3% #3 2,167 3 22
24 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2 1996 57–17 77.0% #2 2,117 3 24
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1997 45–22 67.2% #9 2,026 3 24
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2 1998 47–17 73.4% #4 2,034 4 26
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2 1999 25–17 59.5% #17 1,923 4 27
28 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2 2000 41–19 68.3% #9 1,932 4 27
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2 2001 34–22 60.7% #17 1,796 4 29
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2 2002 21–24 46.7% #53 1,634 4 29
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,518 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Kremer Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 2 4 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 4 9 55.6% 26 10 36 72.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 28 5 33 84.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 5 1 6 83.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3%
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 20 4 24 83.3% 22 6 28 78.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 31 5 36 86.1% 26 7 33 78.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 27 3 30 90.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
22 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 38 5 43 88.4% 24 2 26 92.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
23 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1995 20 8 28 71.4% 21 3 24 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 23 8 31 74.2% 23 5 28 82.1% 6 1 7 85.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 3 8 62.5%
26 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1998 28 8 36 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 9 8 17 52.9% 15 6 21 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2000 22 9 31 71.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 15 15 30 50.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 9 13 22 40.9% 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — — — — —
31 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 297 118 415 71.6% 329 102 431 76.3% 57 18 75 76.0% 37 33 70 52.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Kremer Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1620 109.9 — — — — -68 +75 — 57.1% +0.13 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 105.4 +3.20
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1639 128.0 — — — — -145 +141 — 48.1% -0.35 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.37
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1785 156.3 — — — — -239 +151 — 67.0% +1.55 0–5 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.9 -0.14
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2066 163.2 — — — — -271 +71 -441 74.2% +1.91 8–4 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 -3.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2081 165.6 — — — — -183 +86 -321 70.1% +1.57 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.5 -4.19
19 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09 1991 2168 175.0 — — — — -81 +83 -252 75.0% +2.29 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 103.4 -3.51
20 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12 1992 2284 179.5 — — — — -5 +24 — 75.6% +1.86 10–8 (56%) 12–1 (92%) 107.1 -6.89
21 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53 1993 2248 179.1 — — — — -9 +146 -280 77.4% +2.28 13–3 (81%) 8–6 (57%) 104.5 -2.91
22 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65 1994 2334 179.3 — — — — -14 +77 -381 82.8% +2.52 12–6 (67%) 14–3 (82%) 105.3 -3.56
23 1999 1640 130.4 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35 1995 2167 167.9 — — — — -23 +257 -97 73.5% +1.92 11–5 (69%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -1.09
24 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80 1996 2118 172.0 — — — — -21 +231 +89 71.5% +1.61 13–6 (68%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -1.50
25 2001 1696 135.0 — — — — +1 -56 +60 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14 1997 2027 162.2 — — — — -3 +132 +232 64.2% +1.13 10–9 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +1.63
26 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24 1998 2035 164.7 — — — — -10 +128 +211 66.4% +1.25 16–7 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 100.2 +1.12
27 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58 1999 1924 153.3 — — — — +11 +138 +206 55.2% +0.49 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 -0.61
28 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32 2000 1933 158.0 — — — — -18 +139 +277 62.9% +0.64 14–6 (70%) 9–0 (100%) 108.9 -1.56
29 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09 2001 1797 144.3 — — — — -25 +299 — 56.9% +0.68 12–8 (60%) 5–10 (33%) 89.3 +1.17
30 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81 2002 1635 126.7 — — — — +18 +228 — 47.0% -0.12 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 92.1 +1.10
31 2007 1519 118.4 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -39 +123 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1461 103.4 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +17 +102 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1475 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1464 94.4 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +13 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 132.3 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +2 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12 — 2385 171.0 — — — — -40 +138 -56 68.5% +1.46 151–93 (62%) 92–61 (60%) 103.1 -2.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.