H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anne Kremer vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 0-1
Barbara Rittner holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 2002 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Barbara Rittner | 6-1 6-4 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Kremer | Barbara Rittner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |