H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Kremer vs Cara Black H2H: 2-0
Anne Kremer holds a 2–0 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2001 San Diego second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2001* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Anne Kremer | 6-2 6-1 | Cara Black | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2000* | Auckland | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Anne Kremer | 6-4 6-4 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Kremer | Cara Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |