H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 2-0

Anne Kremer holds a 2–0 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2002 Birmingham round of 16 6-0 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Kremer #24 6-0 5-7 6-4 Daja Bedanova #29 Match data Jun 14, 2002* R16 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Anne Kremer #37 7-5 5-7 6-4 Daja Bedanova #27 Match data Sep 27, 2001* R32 Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Daja Bedanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1
20 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Kremer Daja Bedanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Kremer Daja Bedanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29
19 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10
20 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74
21 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49
23 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12 — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.