H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Erika De Lone H2H: 1-1

Anne Kremer and Erika De Lone are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on grass, while Erika De Lone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Erika De Lone won the 1999 Kuala Lumpur third round 6-2 2-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 11, 1999* Kuala Lumpur WTA 250 R32 Hard Erika De Lone #90 6-2 2-1 (ret.) Anne Kremer #39 Match data
Jun 12, 1996* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Anne Kremer #157 2-6 7-5 7-5 Erika De Lone #131 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Erika De Lone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0
20 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0
24 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,500 0 0
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,484 0 0
28 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,428 0 0
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,422 0 0
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —