H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Erika De Lone H2H: 1-1

Anne Kremer and Erika De Lone are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on grass, while Erika De Lone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Erika De Lone won the 1999 Kuala Lumpur round of 32 6-2 2-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Erika De Lone #90 6-2 2-1 (ret.) Anne Kremer #39 Match data Nov 11, 1999* R32 Kuala Lumpur Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Anne Kremer #157 2-6 7-5 7-5 Erika De Lone #131 Match data Jun 12, 1996* R64 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Erika De Lone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0
20 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0
24 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,510 0 0
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,488 0 0
28 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,431 0 0
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,426 0 0
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Kremer Erika De Lone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1993 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1999 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 33 62 95 34.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 2 12 14 14.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Kremer Erika De Lone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1472 91.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0–1 — +0.43
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1503 119.2 — — — — +41 — — 42.9% -0.95 0–1 1–1 — +0.36
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1558 128.6 — — — — +55 — — 40.4% -0.90 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.39
19 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09 1992 1527 95.8 — — — — +59 — — 30.8% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
20 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12 1993 1515 103.3 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -1.24 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +0.69
21 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53 1994 1437 100.1 — — — — +35 — — 21.7% -1.56 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.52
22 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65 1995 1483 128.5 — — — — -5 +65 — 37.9% -0.69 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.88
23 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35 1996 1450 101.8 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.33
24 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80 1997 1443 109.8 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.34
25 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14 1998 1443 103.8 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -1.57 1–1 — — +0.26
26 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24 1999 1510 115.1 — — — — +43 — — 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34
27 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58 2000 1489 107.2 — — — — -3 +9 -68 32.7% -1.58 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.13
28 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32 2001 1432 93.8 — — — — +13 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.32
29 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09 2002 1426 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.08
30 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12 — 1603 117.1 — — — — +31 +28 -68 35.9% -1.14 14–37 (27%) 10–13 (43%) 87.6 +1.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.