H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Florencia Labat H2H: 0-1

Florencia Labat holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1997 Australian Open round of 128 7-5 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florencia Labat #51 7-5 4-6 6-2 Anne Kremer #125 Match data Jan 15, 1997* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Kremer — #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Florencia Labat — #26 733 1,867 191 184 50.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0 1992 18–17 51.4% #52 1,729 0 0
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,762 0 0
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,787 0 0
24 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,781 0 0
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1996 25–18 58.1% #42 1,771 0 0
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2 2000 8–10 44.4% — 1,609 0 0
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,518 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Kremer Florencia Labat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1994 24 12 36 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 106 84 190 55.8% 66 73 139 47.5% 12 12 24 50.0% 7 15 22 31.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Kremer Florencia Labat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1483 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1546 111.0 — — — — +36 +1 — 47.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.8 +1.39
19 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09 1990 1573 118.8 — — — — +21 -15 — 42.5% -0.55 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +1.08
20 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12 1991 1671 134.2 — — — — -10 -1 — 48.8% -0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 106.9 -0.64
21 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53 1992 1730 132.2 — — — — +21 -68 — 50.6% +0.11 6–7 (46%) 0–1 — +0.14
22 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65 1993 1763 141.4 — — — — -21 +6 -161 56.0% +0.68 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.9 -1.64
23 1999 1640 130.4 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35 1994 1788 140.0 — — — — -25 — -123 58.3% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 -0.06
24 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80 1995 1781 133.8 — — — — -27 +8 — 50.8% +0.17 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.32
25 2001 1696 135.0 — — — — +1 -56 +60 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14 1996 1772 142.8 — — — — +32 -66 -47 57.0% +0.70 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 98.7 +0.20
26 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24 1997 1675 134.1 — — — — +6 +54 +73 48.1% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 +1.02
27 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58 1998 1656 126.6 — — — — +51 -6 +26 40.8% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.11
28 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32 1999 1621 118.4 — — — — +82 -10 — 35.0% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.60
29 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09 2000 1610 110.7 — — — — +26 +27 — 45.2% -0.74 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.45
30 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1519 118.4 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -39 +123 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1461 103.4 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +17 +102 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1475 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1464 94.4 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +13 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 132.3 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +2 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12 — 1868 138.5 — — — — +9 -5 -37 49.9% -0.02 67–55 (55%) 38–29 (57%) 106.9 +0.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.