H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anne Kremer vs Gala Leon Garcia H2H: 1-2
Gala Leon Garcia holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gala Leon Garcia leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 2002 Waikoloa third round 6-3 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2002* | Waikoloa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anne Kremer | 6-4 6-4 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2001* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-2 6-4 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Kremer | Gala Leon Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |