H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Kremer vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 0-1
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1996 Budapest fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1996* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Julie Halard-Decugis | 7-5 6-2 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Kremer | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |