H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-0

Anne Kremer holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2011 Kuala Lumpur third round 4-6 6-2 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 3, 2011* Kuala Lumpur WTA 250 R32 Hard Anne Kremer #169 4-6 6-2 7-6(5) Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8