H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Maja Matevzic H2H: 0-1

Maja Matevzic holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maja Matevzic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maja Matevzic won the 2002 Wimbledon round of 64 2-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Maja Matevzic
SLO Age 46 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maja Matevzic #57 2-6 6-1 6-2 Anne Kremer #22 Match data Jun 28, 2002* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Maja Matevzic #1,250 #38 840 1,716 46 51 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Maja Matevzic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0 2001 2–4 33.3% #75 1,523 0 0
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0 2002 23–22 51.1% #51 1,665 0 1
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0 2003 19–19 50.0% #57 1,702 0 1
24 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2 2004 1–1 50.0% #303 1,710 0 1
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 2005 1–5 16.7% #649 1,619 0 1
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Kremer Maja Matevzic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 11 9 20 55.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2005 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 17 20 37 45.9% 21 23 44 47.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Kremer Maja Matevzic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53 2001 1524 116.1 — — — — +47 — — 38.5% -1.23 0–1 — — -0.29
22 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65 2002 1666 122.2 — — — — +7 -134 -79 46.1% -0.13 11–5 (69%) 3–7 (30%) 103.6 +1.13
23 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35 2003 1703 120.9 +0.95 -1.78 0.938 49.2% -56 -18 -89 49.4% -0.33 11–4 (73%) 6–2 (75%) 109.5 0.00
24 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80 2004 1711 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — -0.17
25 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14 2005 1619 86.1 — — — — — 0 — 25.0% -2.58 1–1 0–1 — +0.12
26 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12 — 1717 120.3 +0.95 -1.78 0.938 49.2% -9 -65 -84 45.8% -0.45 23–11 (68%) 10–10 (50%) 107.6 +0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.