H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Maureen Drake H2H: 1-2

Maureen Drake holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Maureen Drake leads 1–0 on carpet, while Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maureen Drake won the 2002 Quebec City round of 32 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maureen Drake #105 6-4 7-5 Anne Kremer #21 Match data Sep 19, 2002* R32 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Maureen Drake #52 6-2 6-3 Anne Kremer #32 Match data Aug 18, 1999* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anne Kremer #40 6-2 6-3 Maureen Drake #51 Match data May 26, 1999* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Maureen Drake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0
20 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0
24 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0
28 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Kremer Maureen Drake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 41/71 of Anne Kremer's and 5/15 of Maureen Drake's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anne Kremer Maureen Drake
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
29 2005 5/18 2.4 1.6 69.3% 58.4% 35.9% 47.0% 58.1% 51.0% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 5/12 0.8 3.0 62.0% 50.4% 41.6% 42.4% 30.3% 47.5% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 12/20 1.3 2.7 70.8% 54.9% 43.4% 43.1% 45.8% 51.6% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 9/10 1.0 3.8 62.2% 52.5% 39.7% 44.1% 42.5% 47.5% 42.9% 2003 3/11 5.0 3.0 70.6% 61.6% 38.1% 55.6% 53.7% 54.7% 41.3%
33 2009 3/4 0.7 4.7 60.9% 59.4% 32.9% 41.7% 30.0% 49.0% 36.5% 2004 2/4 0.5 3.5 59.5% 53.5% 46.5% 45.4% 44.4% 50.3% 40.3%
35 2011 7/7 1.7 2.6 66.0% 52.0% 38.2% 34.7% 59.6% 47.4% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41/333 1.3 3.0 66.1% 54.1% 39.8% 42.2% 45.9% 49.2% 41.4% — 5/133 3.2 3.2 66.2% 58.4% 41.5% 51.6% 50.0% 52.9% 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Kremer Maureen Drake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46
19 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
20 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35
21 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07
22 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21
23 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.35 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
24 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.80 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19
25 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.14 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.24 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01
27 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01
28 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.32 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.23
29 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.30
30 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
31 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.14
32 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.08
33 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11
35 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12 — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.