H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Maureen Drake H2H: 1-2

Maureen Drake holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Maureen Drake leads 1–0 on carpet, while Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maureen Drake won the 2002 Quebec City third round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 19, 2002* Quebec City WTA 250 R32 Carpet Maureen Drake #105 6-4 7-5 Anne Kremer #21 Match data
Aug 18, 1999* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R64 Hard Maureen Drake #52 6-2 6-3 Anne Kremer #32 Match data
May 26, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Anne Kremer #40 6-2 6-3 Maureen Drake #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Maureen Drake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,498 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,464 0 0
20 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,415 0 0
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0
24 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,454 0 0
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0
28 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,502 0 0
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,461 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,467 0 0
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —