H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 2-1

Anne Kremer holds a 2–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on carpet, while Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2002 Birmingham third round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 13, 2002* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Anne Kremer #24 6-4 7-5 Miriam Oremans #91 Match data
Feb 18, 2000* Hanover WTA 500 R16 Hard Anne Kremer #28 6-2 6-4 Miriam Oremans #89 Match data
Oct 23, 1997* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Carpet Miriam Oremans #52 6-1 6-3 Anne Kremer #132 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0
20 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0
28 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —