H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 2-1

Anne Kremer holds a 2–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on carpet, while Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2002 Birmingham round of 32 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Kremer #24 6-4 7-5 Miriam Oremans #91 Match data Jun 13, 2002* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Anne Kremer #28 6-2 6-4 Miriam Oremans #89 Match data Feb 18, 2000* R16 Hanover Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Miriam Oremans #52 6-1 6-3 Anne Kremer #132 Match data Oct 23, 1997* R32 Luxembourg Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0
20 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0
28 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Kremer Miriam Oremans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
29 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
30 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Kremer Miriam Oremans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66
19 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45
20 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65
21 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41
22 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91
23 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41
24 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65
25 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25
26 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78
27 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23
28 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04
29 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42
30 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12 — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.