H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Monica Seles H2H: 1-1

Anne Kremer and Monica Seles are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on grass, while Monica Seles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2000 US Open second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Monica Seles #6 6-3 6-4 Anne Kremer #39 Match data
Jun 18, 1999* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Anne Kremer #40 6-4 6-4 Monica Seles #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 — — — — — — — 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 — — — — — — — 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —