H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Monica Seles H2H: 1-1

Anne Kremer and Monica Seles are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on grass, while Monica Seles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2000 US Open second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Seles #6 6-3 6-4 Anne Kremer #39 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Anne Kremer #40 6-4 6-4 Monica Seles #4 Match data Jun 18, 1999* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 586 123 82.7% 9 9 3 21 11 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,599 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,005 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,296 1 10
17 — — — — — — — 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,444 4 20
18 — — — — — — — 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,500 7 30
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,486 8 32
20 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,488 8 33
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0 1996 46–9 83.6% #2 2,344 9 38
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,180 9 41
24 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,180 9 43
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,120 9 44
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2 2000 56–13 81.2% #4 2,153 9 47
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,132 9 51
28 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,091 9 53
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,994 9 53
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Kremer Monica Seles
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 2 8 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 18 2 20 90.0% 22 0 22 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 40 3 43 93.0% 19 2 21 90.5% — — — — 15 1 16 93.8%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 33 3 36 91.7% 19 1 20 95.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 12 0 12 100.0%
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 11 1 12 91.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0%
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 29 2 31 93.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
23 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1997 27 5 32 84.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 20 5 25 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1999 21 7 28 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 2000 28 9 37 75.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5%
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 36 9 45 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0%
28 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2002 27 8 35 77.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
29 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
30 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 316 63 379 83.4% 142 25 167 85.0% 35 11 46 76.1% 93 24 117 79.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 41/71 of Anne Kremer's and 1/17 of Monica Seles's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anne Kremer Monica Seles
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
29 2005 5/18 2.4 1.6 69.3% 58.4% 35.9% 47.0% 58.1% 51.0% 43.0% 2003 1/17 1.0 12.0 54.2% 50.0% 25.9% 40.0% 28.6% 39.0% 42.9%
30 2006 5/12 0.8 3.0 62.0% 50.4% 41.6% 42.4% 30.3% 47.5% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 12/20 1.3 2.7 70.8% 54.9% 43.4% 43.1% 45.8% 51.6% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 9/10 1.0 3.8 62.2% 52.5% 39.7% 44.1% 42.5% 47.5% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 3/4 0.7 4.7 60.9% 59.4% 32.9% 41.7% 30.0% 49.0% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 7/7 1.7 2.6 66.0% 52.0% 38.2% 34.7% 59.6% 47.4% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41/333 1.3 3.0 66.1% 54.1% 39.8% 42.2% 45.9% 49.2% 41.4% — 1/709 1.0 12.0 54.2% 50.0% 25.9% 40.0% 28.6% 39.0% 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Kremer Monica Seles
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1600 134.7 — — — — +49 — — 58.8% +0.29 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.41
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2005 170.5 — — — — -46 -209 -385 75.8% +2.03 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 107.2 -0.76
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2297 179.4 — — — — -85 -99 -561 84.8% +2.78 7–3 (70%) 7–1 (88%) 110.0 -3.90
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2445 183.7 — — — — 0 -66 — 86.9% +3.17 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 105.2 -3.24
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2501 182.5 — — — — +9 -35 -586 88.2% +3.24 10–1 (91%) 2–2 (50%) 107.7 -2.26
19 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09 1993 2486 173.2 — — — — +21 -78 — 85.4% +3.27 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.84
20 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53 1995 2488 169.9 — — — — +5 — — 92.0% +3.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.63
22 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65 1996 2344 176.3 — — — — +27 +5 -308 83.5% +2.58 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 96.5 -0.42
23 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35 1997 2181 174.0 — — — — +75 +103 -181 72.3% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 90.3 -0.17
24 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80 1998 2180 173.5 — — — — +55 +77 -125 70.2% +1.77 10–5 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 -1.32
25 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14 1999 2120 173.1 — — — — +56 +123 -164 73.3% +2.05 3–2 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -0.29
26 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24 2000 2153 175.3 — — — — +19 +110 -86 78.0% +2.03 9–5 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 106.4 -2.96
27 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58 2001 2132 162.9 — — — — +27 — — 73.5% +1.72 10–5 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 95.6 +1.21
28 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32 2002 2091 167.1 — — — — +54 +166 +47 70.1% +1.67 14–4 (78%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 -1.76
29 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09 2003 1995 139.5 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +112 +183 — 56.8% +0.57 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -0.67
30 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12 — 2541 181.1 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +21 +17 -276 78.2% +2.32 102–45 (69%) 69–52 (57%) 102.4 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.