H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 0-2

Natasha Zvereva holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1999 Eastbourne quarterfinal 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 19, 1999* Eastbourne WTA 250 QF Grass Natasha Zvereva #17 6-0 6-1 Anne Kremer #40 Match data
Aug 13, 1998* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Natasha Zvereva #18 7-5 6-2 Anne Kremer #156 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2
20 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3
24 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —