H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Paola Suarez H2H: 2-3

Paola Suarez holds a 3–2 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Paola Suarez leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 2004 Wimbledon third round 6-1 4-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Paola Suarez
ARG Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Paola Suarez #11 6-1 4-6 6-0 Anne Kremer #181 Match data
Apr 14, 2004* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Paola Suarez #13 6-4 6-4 Anne Kremer #440 Match data
May 15, 2002* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anne Kremer #25 6-3 6-1 Paola Suarez #45 Match data
May 17, 2001* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Paola Suarez #27 5-7 6-1 7-6(1) Anne Kremer #30 Match data
Jan 8, 2000* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Anne Kremer #31 6-3 5-7 6-4 Paola Suarez #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Paola Suarez #525 #9 2,081 1,916 223 180 55.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Paola Suarez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1993 2–1 66.7% #197 1,519 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1994 5–8 38.5% #114 1,536 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1995 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0
20 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0 1996 12–11 52.2% #62 1,618 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1997 6–16 27.3% #118 1,556 0 0
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0 1998 10–9 52.6% #80 1,535 0 1
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0 1999 12–12 50.0% #72 1,597 0 1
24 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2 2000 27–22 55.1% #36 1,677 0 1
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 2001 27–15 64.3% #27 1,736 0 2
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2 2002 30–23 56.6% #27 1,697 0 2
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2 2003 37–22 62.7% #14 1,859 0 3
28 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2 2004 37–17 68.5% #16 1,804 0 4
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2 2005 3–7 30.0% #238 1,712 0 4
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2 2006 10–9 52.6% #178 1,699 0 4
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2 2007 3–2 60.0% #300 1,689 0 4
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —