H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Sanda Mamic H2H: 1-0

Anne Kremer holds a 1–0 lead over Sanda Mamic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2004 Korea Open quarterfinal 2-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sanda Mamic
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Kremer #113 2-6 6-4 6-1 Sanda Mamic #134 Match data Oct 2, 2004* QF Korea Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sanda Mamic #1,100 #83 437 1,586 14 23 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Sanda Mamic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 2004 6–6 50.0% #106 1,556 0 0
20 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0 2005 5–11 31.2% #171 1,517 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #193 1,510 0 0
24 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Kremer Sanda Mamic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 0 4 4 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 4 8 12 33.3% 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Kremer Sanda Mamic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09 2004 1557 120.7 -0.65 -0.79 0.742 44.7% +18 -20 — 51.9% +0.30 1–2 (33%) — — +0.34
20 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12 2005 1518 109.1 -0.82 -1.26 0.888 48.0% -19 +52 — 37.8% -0.65 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 -0.17
21 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35 2008 1510 106.7 -2.80 -0.04 0.885 47.4% -4 +31 — 38.1% -1.29 1–2 (33%) — — -0.17
24 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12 — 1587 114.4 -2.03 -0.47 0.875 47.4% +1 +29 — 42.4% -0.51 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 94.2 0.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.