H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Kremer vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 0-1
Sandra Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 2001 Stanford third round 6-4 5-7 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2001* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 6-4 5-7 7-6(6) | Anne Kremer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Kremer | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |