H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 4-1

Anne Kremer holds a 4–1 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2004 Indian Wells first round 5-7 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 11, 2004* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Silvija Talaja #101 5-7 6-3 6-1 Anne Kremer #645 Match data
Aug 18, 2000* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Anne Kremer #50 7-5 6-3 Silvija Talaja #28 Match data
Jun 23, 2000* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Anne Kremer #41 6-2 6-2 Silvija Talaja #22 Match data
Feb 17, 2000* Hanover WTA 500 R32 Hard Anne Kremer #28 7-5 6-3 Silvija Talaja #24 Match data
Nov 20, 1999* Pattaya WTA 250 SF Hard Anne Kremer #39 4-6 7-6 6-2 Silvija Talaja #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 130 151 46.3% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Silvija Talaja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,588 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,555 0 0
20 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,603 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,700 0 0
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0 2000 24–27 47.1% #29 1,647 0 2
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,543 0 2
24 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,559 0 2
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,543 0 2
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2
28 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —