H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anne Kremer vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 4-1

Anne Kremer holds a 4–1 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2004 Indian Wells Open round of 128 5-7 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main-draw meetings
Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Silvija Talaja #101 5-7 6-3 6-1 Anne Kremer #645 Match data Mar 9, 2004* R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anne Kremer #50 7-5 6-3 Silvija Talaja #28 Match data Aug 18, 2000* R16 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anne Kremer #41 6-2 6-2 Silvija Talaja #22 Match data Jun 23, 2000* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Anne Kremer #28 7-5 6-3 Silvija Talaja #24 Match data Feb 17, 2000* R32 Hanover Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anne Kremer #39 4-6 7-6 6-2 Silvija Talaja #31 Match data Nov 20, 1999* SF Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 131 152 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Kremer Silvija Talaja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,587 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,554 0 0
20 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,602 0 0
21 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,699 0 0
22 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0 2000 25–28 47.2% #29 1,643 0 2
23 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,541 0 2
24 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,561 0 2
25 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2
26 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,545 0 2
27 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2
28 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Kremer Silvija Talaja
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 18 9 27 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 11 15 26 42.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 2001 6 10 16 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 14 13 27 51.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 2004 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 54 72 126 42.9% 64 58 122 52.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 2 8 10 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Kremer Silvija Talaja
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1482 107.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–0 — -0.02
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1486 96.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.23
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1456 101.4 — — — — — +52 — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1588 117.3 — — — — — +65 — 62.1% +0.86 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.42
19 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09 1997 1554 99.9 — — — — — +85 — 38.5% -0.92 0–1 — — +0.70
20 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12 1998 1603 114.3 — — — — -33 +19 — 54.8% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.52
21 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53 1999 1700 132.3 — — — — -87 +71 -46 57.5% +0.55 13–15 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 102.0 +1.18
22 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65 2000 1643 137.9 — — — — -51 +129 +73 45.8% -0.08 13–5 (72%) 3–4 (43%) 107.9 -2.17
23 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35 2001 1542 116.1 — — — — +25 +122 — 35.7% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.2 +0.71
24 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80 2002 1562 119.3 — — — — +33 +31 — 47.4% -0.24 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +1.04
25 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14 2003 1548 116.1 -2.31 -0.57 0.845 46.5% +6 +93 +47 44.0% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 3–6 (33%) 97.2 +0.68
26 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24 2004 1546 112.4 -0.46 -1.30 0.878 47.1% -22 +86 — 46.4% -0.21 4–6 (40%) 1–1 — +0.24
27 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58 2005 1507 106.7 -1.52 -3.11 0.524 38.5% -10 — — 33.3% -0.61 0–2 0–2 — +0.31
28 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12 — 1811 127.0 -1.33 -1.36 0.798 45.3% -16 +78 +13 47.5% -0.10 52–53 (50%) 23–24 (49%) 102.1 +1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.