H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Anne Miller vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-1

Anne Miller and Nancy Feber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nancy Feber leads 1–0 on grass, while Anne Miller leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nancy Feber won the 1996 Wimbledon round of 64 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Miller
USA Age 49
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Nancy Feber
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nancy Feber #93 6-1 6-2 Anne Miller Match data Jun 28, 1996* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Anne Miller 6-0 6-3 Nancy Feber #123 Match data Jan 4, 1995* R64 Jakarta Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Miller — — — 1,700 29 53 35.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Miller Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 1994 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1995 3–7 30.0% — 1,493 0 0 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 1996 9–12 42.9% — 1,612 0 0 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1997 3–13 18.8% — 1,552 0 0 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 1998 13–15 46.4% — 1,646 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0
22 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2000 1–2 33.3% — 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Miller Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1997 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 13 28 41 31.7% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 10 16 37.5% — 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Miller Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1993 1498 107.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.10 1992 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.25
17 1994 1480 101.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — 0.00 1993 1487 111.8 — — — — +51 — — 26.9% -1.54 1–1 — — -0.06
18 1995 1493 115.1 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.33 1–0 0–1 — -0.26 1994 1483 105.3 — — — — -15 — +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.24
19 1996 1613 136.3 — — — — -21 -27 -20 45.7% -0.47 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 101.9 -0.69 1995 1550 117.2 — — — — -78 — +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +0.43
20 1997 1552 119.3 — — — — -17 — — 24.3% -1.76 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 -0.49 1996 1513 113.7 — — — — -89 — +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 1998 1646 131.4 — — — — -41 -32 -45 44.3% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.76 1997 1516 106.1 — — — — -48 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.12
22 1999 1639 107.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 1639 105.4 — — — — -35 — — 28.6% -2.29 1–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1701 132.8 — — — — -17 -30 -33 36.8% -0.93 10–11 (48%) 4–10 (29%) 101.5 -3.11 — 1567 115.2 — — — — -40 — +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.