H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anne Minter vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 2-2
Anne Minter and Catherine Tanvier are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Minter won the 1989 US Open first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anne Minter | 6-2 6-3 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| May 22, 1985* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anne Minter | 6-2 (ret.) | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| May 26, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Catherine Tanvier | 7-5 6-1 | Anne Minter | Match data |
| Dec 5, 1982* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Catherine Tanvier | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Anne Minter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | #554 | #23 | 35 | 1,876 | 219 | 223 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Minter | Catherine Tanvier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 12–23 | 34.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #46 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #75 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #25 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #34 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #443 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,545 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |