H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anne Minter vs Eva Krapl H2H: 1-0

Anne Minter holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Krapl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Minter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Minter won the 1989 Taipei semifinal 7-5 6-1.

AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
SUI Age 60 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Minter #37 7-5 6-1 Eva Krapl #117 Match data Apr 29, 1989* SF Taipei WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Minter #554 #23 35 1,870 220 224 49.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Eva Krapl #635 #94 11 1,559 35 67 34.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Minter Eva Krapl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,495 0 0
16 1979 1–1 50.0% 1,502 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% 1,490 0 0
17 1980 9–4 69.2% 1,628 0 0
18 1981 7–9 43.8% 1,622 0 1 1984 0–1 0.0% 1,474 0 0
19 1982 5–13 27.8% 1,604 0 1 1985 6–4 60.0% 1,534 0 0
20 1983 12–23 34.3% 1,592 0 1 1986 4–9 30.8% #129 1,493 0 0
21 1984 21–21 50.0% #43 1,704 0 1 1987 6–13 31.6% #120 1,483 0 0
22 1985 21–25 45.7% #46 1,700 0 1 1988 7–15 31.8% #115 1,496 0 0
23 1986 11–17 39.3% #75 1,639 0 1 1989 8–13 38.1% #125 1,486 0 0
24 1987 32–20 61.5% #38 1,792 0 3 1990 2–9 18.2% #202 1,403 0 0
25 1988 38–22 63.3% #25 1,817 0 4
26 1989 27–17 61.4% #34 1,785 0 5
27 1990 17–22 43.6% #88 1,695 0 5
28 1991 19–21 47.5% #61 1,693 0 5
29 1992 0–6 0.0% #443 1,578 0 5
30 1993 0–3 0.0% #554 1,544 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Minter Eva Krapl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1980 4 3 7 57.1%
18 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1984 10 7 17 58.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1988 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1986 9 11 20 45.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1987 18 9 27 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 1990 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1988 24 14 38 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1989 23 12 35 65.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1990 8 14 22 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1991 12 16 28 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 119 108 227 52.4% 25 36 61 41.0% 58 53 111 52.3% 12 25 37 32.4% 18 30 48 37.5% 11 21 32 34.4% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 5 5 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Minter Eva Krapl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1495 102.7 0.0% -4.50 -0.33
16 1979 1502 102.4 50.0% +0.25 +0.59 1982 1491 102.0 +31 50.0% +0.50 +0.84
17 1980 1628 118.1 -11 58.1% +0.68 5–0 (100%) 1–1 +0.31
18 1981 1623 117.7 -35 +16 44.7% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–1 +0.54 1984 1475 91.6 0.0% -5.50 +0.20
19 1982 1605 106.0 -77 -89 +5 34.1% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 1–1 -0.48 1985 1535 108.3 57.1% +0.33 1–0 0–1 +0.35
20 1983 1593 108.2 -86 -47 +21 39.0% -0.73 4–10 (29%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 +1.89 1986 1493 104.0 +24 +51 37.5% -0.66 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) +1.71
21 1984 1704 128.8 -75 -187 +11 49.0% +0.33 9–7 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.3 +1.23 1987 1484 110.5 -27 +85 +31 34.1% -0.95 3–3 (50%) 0–5 (0%) 97.5 +1.06
22 1985 1700 129.3 -90 -132 +46 43.7% -0.49 8–5 (62%) 8–4 (67%) 106.0 -1.82 1988 1496 112.8 +6 +12 -25 34.6% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 +0.57
23 1986 1640 120.6 -39 +132 39.3% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 1–4 (20%) 96.1 -0.13 1989 1486 99.5 +4 37.8% -0.89 4–1 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 106.3 +2.34
24 1987 1793 139.4 +33 -215 -70 58.5% +0.45 11–8 (58%) 6–1 (86%) 106.7 +2.98 1990 1404 88.5 +55 +30 28.0% -1.72 0–3 (0%) +1.58
25 1988 1818 139.8 +5 -217 +6 59.0% +0.69 11–7 (61%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 +3.74
26 1989 1786 133.9 +33 -14 60.4% +0.72 6–7 (46%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +3.98
27 1990 1695 126.1 -20 +113 46.0% -0.08 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.0 +0.69
28 1991 1694 129.3 -45 -36 +106 49.5% -0.25 4–7 (36%) 3–5 (38%) 95.8 -0.42
29 1992 1579 94.3 -44 14.3% -2.29 0–2 0–1 +0.85
30 1993 1545 93.1 0.0% -3.50 -0.07
Career 1871 132.4 -22 -124 +20 49.2% 0.00 70–71 (50%) 40–37 (52%) 102.3 +3.13 1560 105.6 +10 +48 0 36.8% -0.91 13–16 (45%) 8–15 (35%) 97.5 +8.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.