H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Anne Minter vs Grace Kim H2H: 2-0

Anne Minter holds a 2–0 lead over Grace Kim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Minter leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Minter won the 1985 Birmingham round of 64 6-2 5-7 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Minter
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Grace Kim
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Minter 6-2 5-7 8-6 Grace Kim Match data Jun 12, 1985* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Anne Minter 6-1 5-7 7-5 Grace Kim Match data Mar 1, 1985* R16 Hershey WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Minter #554 #23 35 1,870 220 224 49.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Minter Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,585 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,591 0 1
16 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1
17 1980 9–4 69.2% — 1,628 0 0 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1
18 1981 7–9 43.8% — 1,622 0 1 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1
19 1982 5–13 27.8% — 1,604 0 1 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1
20 1983 12–23 34.3% — 1,592 0 1 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1
21 1984 21–21 50.0% #43 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1985 21–25 45.7% #46 1,700 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1986 11–17 39.3% #75 1,639 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1987 32–20 61.5% #38 1,792 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1988 38–22 63.3% #25 1,817 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 1989 27–17 61.4% #34 1,785 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 1990 17–22 43.6% #88 1,695 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1991 19–21 47.5% #61 1,693 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1992 0–6 0.0% #443 1,578 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1993 0–3 0.0% #554 1,544 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Minter Grace Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3%
19 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1984 10 7 17 58.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1986 9 11 20 45.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 18 9 27 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 24 14 38 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 23 12 35 65.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 8 14 22 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 12 16 28 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 119 108 227 52.4% 25 36 61 41.0% 58 53 111 52.3% 12 25 37 32.4% — 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Minter Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1592 115.9 — — — — +65 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06
16 1979 1502 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — +0.59 1984 1622 113.8 — — — — +26 — +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48
17 1980 1628 118.1 — — — — — — -11 58.1% +0.68 5–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.31 1985 1694 125.2 — — — — +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64
18 1981 1623 117.7 — — — — — -35 +16 44.7% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.54 1986 1605 117.7 — — — — +47 -126 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32
19 1982 1605 106.0 — — — — -77 -89 +5 34.1% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — -0.48 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +45 — -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.17
20 1983 1593 108.2 — — — — -86 -47 +21 39.0% -0.73 4–10 (29%) 4–7 (36%) 95.0 +1.89 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26
21 1984 1704 128.8 — — — — -75 -187 +11 49.0% +0.33 9–7 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.3 +1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1985 1700 129.3 — — — — -90 -132 +46 43.7% -0.49 8–5 (62%) 8–4 (67%) 106.0 -1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1986 1640 120.6 — — — — -39 — +132 39.3% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 1–4 (20%) 96.1 -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 1793 139.4 — — — — +33 -215 -70 58.5% +0.45 11–8 (58%) 6–1 (86%) 106.7 +2.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1818 139.8 — — — — +5 -217 +6 59.0% +0.69 11–7 (61%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 +3.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 1786 133.9 — — — — +33 — -14 60.4% +0.72 6–7 (46%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +3.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 1695 126.1 — — — — -20 — +113 46.0% -0.08 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.0 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 1694 129.3 — — — — -45 -36 +106 49.5% -0.25 4–7 (36%) 3–5 (38%) 95.8 -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1579 94.3 — — — — -44 — — 14.3% -2.29 0–2 0–1 — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1545 93.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1871 132.4 — — — — -22 -124 +20 49.2% 0.00 70–71 (50%) 40–37 (52%) 102.3 +3.13 — 1705 119.1 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.