H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Minter vs Jana Novotna H2H: 1-2
Jana Novotna holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Minter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jana Novotna leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1991 Australian Open first round 7-6(7) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jana Novotna | 7-6(7) 6-2 | Anne Minter | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1990* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jana Novotna | 6-4 6-1 | Anne Minter | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1987* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anne Minter | 6-7 6-4 6-2 | Jana Novotna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | #554 | #23 | 35 | 1,876 | 219 | 223 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Minter | Jana Novotna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1983 | 12–23 | 34.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1984 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #46 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #75 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1988 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #25 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1989 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #34 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1990 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1991 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #443 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,545 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 |