H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anne Minter vs Kate Gompert H2H: 0-1
Kate Gompert holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Minter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1987 Charleston fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1987* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Kate Gompert | 6-3 6-2 | Anne Minter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | #554 | #23 | 35 | 1,876 | 219 | 223 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Kate Gompert | #316 | #18 | 34 | 1,870 | 85 | 81 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Minter | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 12–23 | 34.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #46 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #75 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #25 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #34 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #301 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #443 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,545 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |