H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Minter vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 1-1
Anne Minter and Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Minter leads 1–0 on clay, while Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1988 Cincinnati fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1988* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-4 7-5 | Anne Minter | Match data |
| May 19, 1988* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Anne Minter | 4-6 6-4 4-0 (ret.) | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | #554 | #23 | 35 | 1,876 | 219 | 223 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Minter | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1980 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1983 | 12–23 | 34.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1984 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #46 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #75 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1988 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #25 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1989 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #34 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1990 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1991 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #443 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,545 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |