Anne Minter
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | 5 | 3 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 4 | 3 | 7 | May 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 6, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Anne Minter holds a 2–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Minter leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Minter won the 1988 Tokyo Pan Pacific round of 32 6-0 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 6-0 3-6 7-6 | Lea Antonoplis | Match data | Apr 28, 1988* | R32 | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Anne Minter | 7-6 7-6 | Lea Antonoplis | Match data | Aug 4, 1984* | QF | Newport | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | #554 | #23 | 35 | 1,870 | 220 | 224 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,770 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Minter | Lea Antonoplis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 12–23 | 34.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1984 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #46 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #75 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #38 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1988 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #34 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1990 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,458 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1991 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #61 | 1,693 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,412 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #443 | 1,578 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,453 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,430 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anne Minter | Lea Antonoplis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1977 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1982 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1978 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 20 | 1983 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1979 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 21 | 1984 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1980 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 22 | 1985 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1981 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1986 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1982 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% |
| 24 | 1987 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1983 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1984 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 26 | 1989 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| 27 | 1990 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1986 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 1991 | 12 | 16 | 28 | 42.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 1992 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1988 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 119 | 108 | 227 | 52.4% | 25 | 36 | 61 | 41.0% | 58 | 53 | 111 | 52.3% | 12 | 25 | 37 | 32.4% | — | 45 | 72 | 117 | 38.5% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 48 | 50 | 98 | 49.0% | 12 | 34 | 46 | 26.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anne Minter | Lea Antonoplis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1579 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | +107 | — | — | 69.6% | +0.70 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +3.55 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1532 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | +96 | — | +11 | 41.2% | -0.65 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +1.36 |
| 16 | 1979 | 1502 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | — | — | +0.59 | 1975 | 1560 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | +137 | — | — | 41.2% | -0.41 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.23 |
| 17 | 1980 | 1628 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -11 | 58.1% | +0.68 | 5–0 (100%) | 1–1 | — | +0.31 | 1976 | 1610 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | +32 | -28 | -16 | 48.0% | -0.16 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.98 |
| 18 | 1981 | 1623 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | — | -35 | +16 | 44.7% | -0.21 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.54 | 1977 | 1652 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | — | -31 | 62.5% | +0.67 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +1.94 |
| 19 | 1982 | 1605 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | -77 | -89 | +5 | 34.1% | -0.98 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–1 | — | -0.48 | 1978 | 1713 | 131.8 | — | — | — | — | -75 | — | +41 | 49.4% | -0.07 | 9–8 (53%) | 7–4 (64%) | 104.2 | +1.01 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1593 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | -86 | -47 | +21 | 39.0% | -0.73 | 4–10 (29%) | 4–7 (36%) | 95.0 | +1.89 | 1979 | 1722 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | -96 | — | +9 | 47.5% | -0.54 | 5–6 (45%) | 8–4 (67%) | 101.3 | -0.92 |
| 21 | 1984 | 1704 | 128.8 | — | — | — | — | -75 | -187 | +11 | 49.0% | +0.33 | 9–7 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 104.3 | +1.23 | 1980 | 1733 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | -109 | — | +62 | 63.3% | +0.80 | 4–3 (57%) | 0–3 (0%) | 98.4 | +1.51 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1700 | 129.3 | — | — | — | — | -90 | -132 | +46 | 43.7% | -0.49 | 8–5 (62%) | 8–4 (67%) | 106.0 | -1.82 | 1981 | 1717 | 116.5 | — | — | — | — | -101 | — | +95 | 43.2% | -0.91 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.92 |
| 23 | 1986 | 1640 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | -39 | — | +132 | 39.3% | -0.54 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.1 | -0.13 | 1982 | 1632 | 114.6 | — | — | — | — | -131 | — | +169 | 37.7% | -1.00 | 2–7 (22%) | 3–5 (38%) | 93.5 | +1.22 |
| 24 | 1987 | 1793 | 139.4 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -215 | -70 | 58.5% | +0.45 | 11–8 (58%) | 6–1 (86%) | 106.7 | +2.98 | 1983 | 1568 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | -36 | +18 | +127 | 32.6% | -1.30 | 3–2 (60%) | — | — | +0.47 |
| 25 | 1988 | 1818 | 139.8 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -217 | +6 | 59.0% | +0.69 | 11–7 (61%) | 4–3 (57%) | 100.8 | +3.74 | 1984 | 1583 | 111.0 | — | — | — | — | -40 | — | +93 | 41.9% | -0.67 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–4 (20%) | 99.4 | +2.39 |
| 26 | 1989 | 1786 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | -14 | 60.4% | +0.72 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–1 (80%) | 98.4 | +3.98 | 1985 | 1571 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | -36 | — | +95 | 41.3% | -0.55 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | 102.7 | +2.25 |
| 27 | 1990 | 1695 | 126.1 | — | — | — | — | -20 | — | +113 | 46.0% | -0.08 | 3–6 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.0 | +0.69 | 1986 | 1459 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | -14 | — | +163 | 26.3% | -1.26 | 0–6 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 90.9 | +0.93 |
| 28 | 1991 | 1694 | 129.3 | — | — | — | — | -45 | -36 | +106 | 49.5% | -0.25 | 4–7 (36%) | 3–5 (38%) | 95.8 | -0.42 | 1987 | 1412 | 91.7 | — | — | — | — | -6 | +46 | — | 34.5% | -1.00 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.6 | +1.71 |
| 29 | 1992 | 1579 | 94.3 | — | — | — | — | -44 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.29 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.85 | 1988 | 1454 | 110.8 | — | — | — | — | -65 | — | +173 | 44.1% | -0.91 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.2 | +0.67 |
| 30 | 1993 | 1545 | 93.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.07 | 1989 | 1447 | 110.4 | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.58 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–2 | — | +0.78 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1431 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.21 |
| Career | — | 1871 | 132.4 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -124 | +20 | 49.2% | 0.00 | 70–71 (50%) | 40–37 (52%) | 102.3 | +3.13 | — | 1771 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | -37 | +2 | +77 | 44.2% | -0.49 | 43–60 (42%) | 33–39 (46%) | 95.8 | +6.46 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | 5 | 3 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 4 | 3 | 7 | May 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 6, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Turnbull | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 26, 1981 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Vicki Nelson | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 20, 1985 | H2H |