Anne Minter
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | 5 | 3 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 4 | 3 | 7 | May 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 6, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Leila Meskhi holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Minter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1991 Washington round of 16 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leila Meskhi | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Anne Minter | Match data | Aug 23, 1991* | R16 | Washington | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Anne Minter | 6-4 6-2 | Leila Meskhi | Match data | Jan 31, 1991* | R32 | ASB Classic | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Leila Meskhi | 6-2 6-4 | Anne Minter | Match data | Oct 6, 1990* | SF | Moscow | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | #554 | #23 | 35 | 1,870 | 220 | 224 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 1,987 | 193 | 121 | 61.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Minter | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 12–23 | 34.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #46 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #75 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #38 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #22 | 1,928 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1988 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1989 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #34 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1990 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1991 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #61 | 1,693 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #443 | 1,578 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anne Minter | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1987 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 20 | 1983 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1988 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 1984 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1989 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 1985 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1990 | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% |
| 23 | 1986 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1991 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 24 | 1987 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1992 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 25 | 1988 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1993 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 1989 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 27 | 1990 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1995 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1991 | 12 | 16 | 28 | 42.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 1992 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 119 | 108 | 227 | 52.4% | 25 | 36 | 61 | 41.0% | 58 | 53 | 111 | 52.3% | 12 | 25 | 37 | 32.4% | — | 101 | 58 | 159 | 63.5% | 64 | 39 | 103 | 62.1% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 25 | 16 | 41 | 61.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anne Minter | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1979 | 1502 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | — | — | +0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 1628 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -11 | 58.1% | +0.68 | 5–0 (100%) | 1–1 | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 1623 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | — | -35 | +16 | 44.7% | -0.21 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 1605 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | -77 | -89 | +5 | 34.1% | -0.98 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–1 | — | -0.48 | 1987 | 1656 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -63 | — | 64.1% | +1.05 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.80 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1593 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | -86 | -47 | +21 | 39.0% | -0.73 | 4–10 (29%) | 4–7 (36%) | 95.0 | +1.89 | 1988 | 1696 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | -166 | 49.4% | -0.23 | 8–5 (62%) | 3–6 (33%) | 102.3 | +0.65 |
| 21 | 1984 | 1704 | 128.8 | — | — | — | — | -75 | -187 | +11 | 49.0% | +0.33 | 9–7 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 104.3 | +1.23 | 1989 | 1795 | 139.4 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -135 | — | 59.2% | +0.57 | 3–3 (50%) | 8–0 (100%) | 108.0 | -1.90 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1700 | 129.3 | — | — | — | — | -90 | -132 | +46 | 43.7% | -0.49 | 8–5 (62%) | 8–4 (67%) | 106.0 | -1.82 | 1990 | 1928 | 151.0 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -112 | -373 | 66.4% | +1.63 | 10–3 (77%) | 3–6 (33%) | 102.3 | +1.11 |
| 23 | 1986 | 1640 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | -39 | — | +132 | 39.3% | -0.54 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.1 | -0.13 | 1991 | 1937 | 151.3 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +20 | — | 62.6% | +0.74 | 9–4 (69%) | 5–5 (50%) | 105.3 | +0.25 |
| 24 | 1987 | 1793 | 139.4 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -215 | -70 | 58.5% | +0.45 | 11–8 (58%) | 6–1 (86%) | 106.7 | +2.98 | 1992 | 1928 | 157.9 | — | — | — | — | -26 | +60 | — | 61.5% | +1.16 | 7–4 (64%) | 3–8 (27%) | 96.9 | -1.71 |
| 25 | 1988 | 1818 | 139.8 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -217 | +6 | 59.0% | +0.69 | 11–7 (61%) | 4–3 (57%) | 100.8 | +3.74 | 1993 | 1872 | 148.4 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +90 | — | 55.3% | +0.05 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.4 | -1.93 |
| 26 | 1989 | 1786 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | -14 | 60.4% | +0.72 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–1 (80%) | 98.4 | +3.98 | 1994 | 1843 | 148.6 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +108 | — | 55.2% | +0.72 | 9–4 (69%) | 3–3 (50%) | 102.8 | +0.52 |
| 27 | 1990 | 1695 | 126.1 | — | — | — | — | -20 | — | +113 | 46.0% | -0.08 | 3–6 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.0 | +0.69 | 1995 | 1833 | 120.0 | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 73.3% | +1.87 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.8 | +0.23 |
| 28 | 1991 | 1694 | 129.3 | — | — | — | — | -45 | -36 | +106 | 49.5% | -0.25 | 4–7 (36%) | 3–5 (38%) | 95.8 | -0.42 | 1996 | 1747 | 89.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.63 | — | — | — | -0.21 |
| 29 | 1992 | 1579 | 94.3 | — | — | — | — | -44 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.29 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 1545 | 93.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1871 | 132.4 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -124 | +20 | 49.2% | 0.00 | 70–71 (50%) | 40–37 (52%) | 102.3 | +3.13 | — | 1987 | 152.8 | — | — | — | — | +2 | 0 | -270 | 58.9% | +0.70 | 52–30 (63%) | 28–33 (46%) | 103.7 | -0.70 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | 5 | 3 | 8 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 3, 1989 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 4 | 3 | 7 | May 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 6, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 9 | 9 | Apr 30, 1994 | H2H |
| Natasha Zvereva | 3 | 5 | 8 | Aug 19, 1993 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 6 | 6 | Oct 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 1, 1994 | H2H |
| Katerina Maleeva | 4 | 2 | 6 | Apr 29, 1994 | H2H |