H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anne Minter vs Nicole Arendt H2H: 0-1
Nicole Arendt holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Minter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Arendt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Arendt won the 1986 US Open first round 7-5 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicole Arendt | 7-5 2-6 6-2 | Anne Minter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | #554 | #23 | 35 | 1,876 | 219 | 223 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Nicole Arendt | #433 | #49 | 487 | 1,776 | 67 | 75 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Minter | Nicole Arendt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 12–23 | 34.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #46 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #75 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #73 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #25 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #34 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #443 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #143 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,545 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |