H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anne Minter vs Patty Fendick H2H: 0-1
Patty Fendick holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Minter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1988 Tokyo Japan Open quarterfinal 6-0 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1988* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-0 3-6 6-2 | Anne Minter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | #554 | #23 | 35 | 1,876 | 219 | 223 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Minter | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 12–23 | 34.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #46 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #75 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1988 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #25 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1989 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #34 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1990 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1991 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #443 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,545 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |