H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anne Minter vs Sylvia Hanika H2H: 1-1
Anne Minter and Sylvia Hanika are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on clay, while Anne Minter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Minter won the 1989 Toronto quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1989 | Toronto | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Anne Minter | 6-2 6-3 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| May 17, 1984* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Sylvia Hanika | 6-2 6-2 | Anne Minter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | #554 | #23 | 35 | 1,876 | 219 | 223 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Minter | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1983 | 12–23 | 34.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1984 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #46 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #75 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1988 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #25 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1989 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #34 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1990 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1991 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #443 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,545 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 |