H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anne Papenfus vs C Cehrman H2H: 1-0

Anne Papenfus holds a 1–0 lead over C Cehrman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Papenfus leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Papenfus won the 1969 South African Open round of 64 6-0 3-6 6-2.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Papenfus 6-0 3-6 6-2 C Cehrman Match data Apr 3, 1969* R64 South African Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Papenfus 1,501 2 2 50.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
C Cehrman 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Anne Papenfus C Cehrman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 1–1 50.0% 1,484 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% 1,483 0 0
1969 1–1 50.0% 1,486 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Anne Papenfus C Cehrman
Yr Hard Yr Hard
W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 1 1 2 50.0% 1969 0 1 1 0.0%
1969 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 2 2 4 50.0% Career 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Anne Papenfus C Cehrman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1485 99.5 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.01 1969 1483 97.0 33.3% -2.33 0–1 +0.06
1969 1486 101.9 50.0% +0.67 1–1 +0.11
Career 1501 100.7 44.4% +0.11 1–2 (33%) +4.00 Career 1500 98.4 33.3% -2.33 0–1 +6.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.