H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anne Smith vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 1-4
Andrea Jaeger holds a 4–1 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1982 Wimbledon fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Anne Smith | 6-4 6-2 | Andrea Jaeger | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1982* | Detroit | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Andrea Jaeger | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1981* | Deerfield Beach | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Andrea Jaeger | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1981* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Andrea Jaeger | 6-2 6-3 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1980* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrea Jaeger | 6-1 6-0 | Anne Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Andrea Jaeger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |