H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anne Smith vs Beth Herr H2H: 1-2
Beth Herr holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on carpet, while Beth Herr leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Beth Herr won the 1986 Tulsa third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1986* | Tulsa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Beth Herr | 7-5 7-5 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1985* | Palm Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Beth Herr | 6-1 6-4 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Mar 5, 1981* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 6-3 6-1 | Beth Herr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Beth Herr | #424 | #31 | 18 | 1,784 | 107 | 128 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Beth Herr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #52 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #132 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |