H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anne Smith vs Beverly Bowes H2H: 0-1
Beverly Bowes holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beverly Bowes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Beverly Bowes won the 1986 US Open first round 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Beverly Bowes | 6-2 7-6(4) | Anne Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Beverly Bowes | #597 | #49 | 16 | 1,678 | 69 | 120 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Beverly Bowes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #75 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #101 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #113 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #130 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #426 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |