H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anne Smith vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 2-0
Anne Smith holds a 2–0 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1988 New Orleans fourth round 5-7 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1988* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anne Smith | 5-7 7-5 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1981* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anne Smith | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |