H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anne Smith vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 2-1
Anne Smith holds a 2–1 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1989 Chicago third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1989* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 6-3 6-3 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1984* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Eva Pfaff | 6-2 7-6 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Jan 3, 1983 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 6-3 0-6 6-4 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Eva Pfaff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |