H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anne Smith vs Halle Cioffi H2H: 0-2
Halle Cioffi holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Halle Cioffi leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Halle Cioffi won the 1990 Boca Raton third round 2-6 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1990* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Halle Cioffi | 2-6 6-3 7-6 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1987* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Halle Cioffi | 4-6 6-4 7-6 | Anne Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Halle Cioffi | #767 | #31 | 26 | 1,765 | 88 | 98 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Halle Cioffi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #95 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |