H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anne Smith vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 2-1
Anne Smith holds a 2–1 lead over Helen Kelesi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 2–0 on carpet, while Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1990 Washington third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1990 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 6-1 6-2 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1989* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 6-4 6-2 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Helen Kelesi | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Anne Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Helen Kelesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |