H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anne Smith vs Joanne Russell H2H: 0-2
Joanne Russell holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joanne Russell leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Joanne Russell won the 1981 Cincinnati fourth round 1-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1981* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Joanne Russell | 1-6 7-5 6-1 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1980* | Richmond | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Joanne Russell | 7-6 5-7 6-1 | Anne Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Joanne Russell | — | — | — | 1,935 | 203 | 199 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Joanne Russell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 20–22 | 47.6% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 5 |