H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anne Smith vs Kathy Jordan H2H: 6-2

Anne Smith holds a 6–2 lead over Kathy Jordan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 6–1 on carpet, while Kathy Jordan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1986 Wichita round of 32 2-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Smith
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main-draw meetings
Kathy Jordan
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Smith 2-6 6-1 6-2 Kathy Jordan #18 Match data Jan 23, 1986* R32 Wichita WTA 250 Carpet
Kathy Jordan 6-2 6-3 Anne Smith Match data May 25, 1983* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Anne Smith 6-4 6-7 6-3 Kathy Jordan Match data Feb 25, 1983* R16 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Anne Smith 6-2 3-6 6-1 Kathy Jordan Match data Mar 24, 1982 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Kathy Jordan 6-2 4-6 6-1 Anne Smith Match data Mar 20, 1982* QF Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Anne Smith 3-6 6-2 6-4 Kathy Jordan Match data Jan 21, 1982* R32 Seattle WTA 250 Carpet
Anne Smith 7-6 6-4 Kathy Jordan Match data Jan 30, 1981* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Anne Smith 6-4 7-5 Kathy Jordan Match data Jan 22, 1981* R32 Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Smith — — — 2,051 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kathy Jordan #520 #5 44 2,093 249 155 61.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Smith Kathy Jordan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,634 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2 1978 4–3 57.1% — 1,560 0 0
19 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,849 0 2 1979 25–13 65.8% — 1,893 0 1
20 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,866 0 2 1980 37–21 63.8% — 2,001 0 1
21 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,936 0 2 1981 28–20 58.3% — 1,921 0 1
22 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,899 0 2 1982 21–18 53.8% — 1,884 0 2
23 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,898 0 2 1983 44–22 66.7% — 2,009 0 2
24 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,874 0 2 1984 23–11 67.6% #10 2,023 0 2
25 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,900 0 3 1985 28–15 65.1% #12 1,979 0 2
26 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,718 0 3 1986 25–15 62.5% #15 1,910 0 2
27 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,785 0 3 1987 12–10 54.5% #35 1,892 0 2
28 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,777 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,850 0 3 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,874 0 2
30 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3 1990 2–6 25.0% #207 1,791 0 2
31 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Smith Kathy Jordan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8% 1979 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
20 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1980 10 4 14 71.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 19 12 31 61.3%
21 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3% 1981 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 9 20 55.0%
22 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7% 1982 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
23 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1983 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1985 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 11 5 16 68.8%
26 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7% — 85 46 131 64.9% 20 18 38 52.6% 57 32 89 64.0% 87 59 146 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Smith Kathy Jordan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1977 1634 138.6 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1777 139.8 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.88 1978 1561 118.9 — — — — — — +39 58.8% +0.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.09
19 1979 1849 152.6 — — — — -9 -187 -232 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.77 1979 1894 155.9 — — — — +33 — -200 61.0% +1.00 5–3 (63%) 1–4 (20%) 104.2 +0.19
20 1980 1866 144.9 — — — — -31 -177 -216 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 -5.69 1980 2001 163.9 — — — — +36 -360 -260 63.3% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 102.2 -5.58
21 1981 1936 153.7 — — — — +39 -231 -156 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67 1981 1921 148.1 — — — — +51 -258 -73 60.0% +0.90 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 97.1 +1.06
22 1982 1899 156.9 — — — — +43 -216 -37 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.82 1982 1884 146.3 — — — — +58 -205 -59 53.2% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -3.84
23 1983 1898 139.9 — — — — +42 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.37 1983 2010 155.5 — — — — -21 -247 -32 62.3% +1.00 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 103.8 -2.02
24 1984 1875 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.29 1984 2024 159.6 — — — — -49 -276 +117 65.3% +1.16 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 -2.73
25 1985 1900 131.1 — — — — — -248 -3 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.34 1985 1979 155.4 — — — — +58 — +38 59.8% +1.02 13–5 (72%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -2.92
26 1986 1719 120.9 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.98 1986 1911 153.3 — — — — +58 — +131 62.2% +1.00 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 96.2 -1.31
27 1987 1786 131.9 — — — — +7 — +60 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.68 1987 1892 137.2 — — — — +45 — +97 56.3% +0.46 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 99.1 -1.65
28 1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -6 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.03 1989 1875 106.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
30 1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -8 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19 1990 1792 109.8 — — — — +34 — +142 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -1.37
31 1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2051 154.3 — — — — +14 -189 -73 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.1 -4.21 — 2094 160.4 — — — — +32 -275 -8 59.9% +0.80 67–55 (55%) 35–31 (53%) 101.2 -5.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.