H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Smith vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 1-0
Anne Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1986 Wichita fourth round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1986* | Wichita | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 6-3 7-6 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anne Smith | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |