H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Smith vs Laura Arraya H2H: 2-1
Anne Smith holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1983 Deerfield Beach fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 1983* | Deerfield Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anne Smith | 6-3 6-0 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1983* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Laura Arraya | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1981* | Deerfield Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anne Smith | 6-3 6-1 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |