H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Anne Smith vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 1-0

Anne Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1982 Australian Open round of 64 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Smith
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Smith 3-6 6-4 6-3 Lea Antonoplis Match data Dec 3, 1982* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Smith — — — 2,053 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Smith Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,633 0 1 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,850 0 2 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0
20 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,870 0 2 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1
21 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,938 0 2 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,900 0 2 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2
23 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,899 0 2 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,875 0 2 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,901 0 3 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,719 0 3 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2
27 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,786 0 3 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2
28 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,778 0 3 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,851 0 3 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2
30 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2
31 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Smith Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8% 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7% — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Smith Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22
17 1977 1634 138.5 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.55 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
18 1978 1776 139.7 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.91 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95
19 1979 1850 152.8 — — — — -10 -187 -233 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.72 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83
20 1980 1870 145.4 — — — — -29 -181 -221 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -5.91 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98
21 1981 1938 153.9 — — — — +39 -233 -158 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54
22 1982 1901 157.3 — — — — +44 -218 -38 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.3 -1.41 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94
23 1983 1900 140.2 — — — — +41 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.39 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13
24 1984 1876 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.30 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41
25 1985 1902 131.2 — — — — — -250 -5 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.35 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44
26 1986 1719 121.0 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.84 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18
27 1987 1786 132.0 — — — — +8 — +61 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.59 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87
28 1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.73 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66
29 1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -5 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.05 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65
30 1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -7 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77
31 1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
Career — 2053 154.5 — — — — +14 -191 -74 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.2 -4.48 — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.