H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Anne Smith vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 1-2

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1988 Chicago round of 16 7-6 6-2.

USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
SUI Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #7 7-6 6-2 Anne Smith Match data Nov 11, 1988* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #10 7-5 6-1 Anne Smith Match data Jan 9, 1987* R16 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Anne Smith 6-2 6-2 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Match data Dec 5, 1982* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Smith — — — 2,053 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere — #3 148 2,131 464 185 71.5% 0 1 0 2 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Smith Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,687 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,789 0 0
17 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,633 0 1 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,100 0 5
18 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,075 0 6
19 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,850 0 2 1986 42–21 66.7% #8 1,992 0 6
20 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,870 0 2 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,114 0 8
21 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,938 0 2 1988 45–15 75.0% #6 2,102 0 10
22 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,900 0 2 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,019 0 12
23 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,899 0 2 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,068 0 12
24 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,875 0 2 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,028 0 15
25 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,901 0 3 1992 34–13 72.3% #9 1,998 0 16
26 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,719 0 3 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,046 0 18
27 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,786 0 3 1994 12–2 85.7% — 2,067 0 19
28 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,778 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,851 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Smith Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 27 5 32 84.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0%
18 1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1985 7 4 11 63.6% 16 6 22 72.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 5 18 72.2%
19 1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8% 1986 13 5 18 72.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 8 17 52.9%
20 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1987 9 3 12 75.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4%
21 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3% 1988 23 5 28 82.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
22 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7% 1989 15 5 20 75.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5%
23 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1990 19 6 25 76.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7%
24 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 17 4 21 81.0%
25 1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1992 13 4 17 76.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
26 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 16 5 21 76.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
27 1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — 8 1 9 88.9%
28 1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7% — 145 53 198 73.2% 156 62 218 71.6% 38 20 58 65.5% 125 50 175 71.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Smith Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1688 121.9 — — — — -90 -61 -1 55.2% +0.14 6–2 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +1.43
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1789 136.5 — — — — -119 0 -127 57.1% +0.45 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.63
17 1977 1634 138.5 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.55 1984 2101 169.3 — — — — -162 +36 -328 70.4% +1.55 13–7 (65%) 6–2 (75%) 112.6 -2.55
18 1978 1776 139.7 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.91 1985 2076 161.5 — — — — -48 +9 -203 70.6% +1.90 6–4 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.41
19 1979 1850 152.8 — — — — -10 -187 -233 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.72 1986 1993 161.5 — — — — -5 +31 -52 65.7% +1.31 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 90.3 -2.26
20 1980 1870 145.4 — — — — -29 -181 -221 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -5.91 1987 2114 165.7 — — — — -24 -9 -172 68.6% +1.51 14–8 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 -4.28
21 1981 1938 153.9 — — — — +39 -233 -158 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67 1988 2102 162.5 — — — — +47 -48 — 73.1% +1.85 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.56
22 1982 1901 157.3 — — — — +44 -218 -38 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.3 -1.41 1989 2019 154.6 — — — — +29 +17 — 69.0% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +1.23
23 1983 1900 140.2 — — — — +41 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.39 1990 2069 173.2 — — — — +56 -42 — 68.5% +1.77 9–7 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.3 -2.84
24 1984 1876 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.30 1991 2028 159.2 — — — — +51 +26 — 72.7% +1.77 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 +1.33
25 1985 1902 131.2 — — — — — -250 -5 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.35 1992 1999 152.0 — — — — +87 +17 -91 67.0% +1.41 10–3 (77%) 2–4 (33%) 101.2 +2.30
26 1986 1719 121.0 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.84 1993 2046 159.7 — — — — +80 -115 — 65.8% +1.04 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -0.01
27 1987 1786 132.0 — — — — +8 — +61 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.59 1994 2068 143.1 — — — — +47 — — 77.4% +2.36 3–0 (100%) 0–2 — +0.52
28 1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -5 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -7 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 154.5 — — — — +14 -191 -74 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.2 -4.48 — 2131 166.2 — — — — +15 -4 -134 68.1% +1.46 97–70 (58%) 48–41 (54%) 101.4 -1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.